Good Law or Bad Law? You Decide. | LETTER TO THE EDITOR

In order to fully understand the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Affordable Health Care Act, one has to understand what the Supreme Court actually is authorized to do under the Constitution. It is only authorized to rule on the “constitutionality” of anything brought before it.

In order to fully understand the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Affordable Health Care Act, one has to understand what the Supreme Court actually is authorized to do under the Constitution. It is only authorized to rule on the “constitutionality” of anything brought before it.

Part of the way the Affordable Health Care Act was passed was by telling the people that it was absolutely not a tax, but a “mandate.” What the Supreme Court has said in its ruling and written opinion is that it is not a “mandate,” thus not falling under the “Commerce Clause” of the Constitution, but it is  a tax. Many of us were lied to about what it is!  Congress has the right via the Constitution to tax, and it can basically tax anything it wants to.  It is a tax in the same way that FICA is a tax withheld from a paycheck to pay that person’s portion of the Social Security tax.

What Chief Justice Roberts preserved in the long run, frankly, is the position of the Court to not become an “activist court” by usurping its authority into “law making,” and that is a good thing, in my opinion. Law making is rightly reserved to Congress or the state’s legislature.

What the Court and Justice Roberts did not do is tell Americans whether the Affordable Health Care Act is a good law or a poor law or how your politician (pick your side) told you what it might do in the future. Just because something is Constitutional does not inherently make it “good” or “bad” law — it can be either. The Court simply sent it back to Congress who is the law making arm of the federal government. Is it good law or bad law? Do some research and find out for yourself. Courts cannot be used endlessly to right the bad choices the “people” make and/or continue to make. At some point, the “people” must take the responsibility of learning and knowing enough to make wise decisions for themselves in electing the “law makers,” legislators or congresspeople who will make wise and “good” laws.

Catherine Paxton

Arlington

 

 

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor

Vote yes Vote yes for Arlington schools. I urge you to support… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Think schools Thank you to every Arlington citizen who has supported previous… Continue reading

Vote for schools

Vote “Yes” My wife and I are both teachers for Arlington Public… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Volunteer in schools The single-biggest way most of us help support and… Continue reading

Santa’s helper kind

On Nov. 23 I went to Bartell’s in Marysville to finish my… Continue reading

Letter to the editor

Don’t trust city Don’t trust the city of Marysville. After being forced… Continue reading

Letter to the editor

Thanks for passing levy North County Regional Fire Authority wants to thank… Continue reading

Letter to the editor

Vote for Gobel Isn’t the underlying job of a civil servant to… Continue reading

Letter to the editor

Fell for auditor I have grown fairly critical over the years regarding… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Vote for Alexander As a former prosecutor and life-long civil servant, I… Continue reading

3 retired judges voice support for Okoloko

After a 23-year career as a Snohomish County judge, having served over… Continue reading

Letter to the editor

Mom doesn’t know Thanks to the Globe for consistent local reporting. It’s… Continue reading